PRECLINICAL TOXICITY STUDY OF THE NEW ANTIFUNGAL DRUG AMPHAMID
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2020-19-3-57-64
Abstract
Introduction. Amphotericin B remains the drug of first choice in the treatment of most severe systemic fungal infections. However, it is characterized by very low solubility and high toxicity. Amphamide – semisynthetic derivative of Amphotericin B – have been prepared at the Gause Institute of New Antibiotics. It showed several advantages over amphotericin B in vivo.
Objective. The aim of the study was to investigate the toxicological safety of amphamide drug formulation in chronic experiment on rats.
Materials and methods. The study was performed in male and female Wistar rats. Amphamide drug formulation was injected intraperitonealy at the total doses of MTD and LD50 (30 × 0,07 mg/kg or 30 × 0,17 mg/kg with 24-h interval). During the experiment body weight, hematological parameters, blood biochemical parameters, electrocardiography and urinalysis were performed. Animals were sacrificed on 1st and 30th day after the end of treatment. At necropsy, the mass coefficients of heart, liver, kidneys, spleen and thymus were calculated. The internal organs were subjected to histological evaluation.
Results. It has been shown that the treatment with total dose of amphamide produces an increase of urea and creatinine level in serum, changes in urine composition and its specific gravity. Microscopic pathology observation showed dose-dependent structure abnormalities in kidneys, liver, lungs, stomach, and testes. Multiple administration of low dose of the drug produces transient toxic effects completely reversible within 30 days. When amphamide was used in a high dose, morphological signs of toxic cardiomyopathy were found.
Conclusion. The results of the clinical and laboratory studies and microscopic pathology observation of kidneys demonstrate that nephrotoxicity is the main limiting type of drug toxicity. Dose dependence and reversibility within a month of toxic effects of amphamide allows us to recommend it to further advance.
About the Authors
I. D. TreschalinRussian Federation
V. A. Golibrodo
Russian Federation
M. I. Treschalin
Russian Federation
A. N. Tevyashova
Russian Federation
E. R. Pereverzeva
Russian Federation
References
1. Anderson C.M. Sodium chloride treatment of amphotericin B nephrotoxicity – standard of care? West J Med 1995;162(4):313–7. PMID: 7747495.
2. Plumb D.C. Veterinary Drug Handbook. PharmaVet. Publishing, White Bear Lake, USA, 1999. 853 p.
3. Johnson R.H., Einstein H.E. Amphotericin B and coccidioidomicosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007;1111:434–41. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1406.019.
4. Laniado-Laborı´n R., CabralesVargas M.N. Amphotericin B: side effects and toxicity. Rev Iberoam Micol 2009;26(4):223–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.riam.2009.06.003.
5. Ostrosky-Zeichner L., Marr K.A., Rex J.H., Cohen S.H. Amphotericin B: time for a new “gold standard”. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:415–25. DOI: 10.1086/376634.
6. Sawaya B.P., Briggs J.P., Schnermann J. Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity: the adverse consequences of altered membrane properties. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995;6:154–64. PMID: 7579079.
7. Lemke A., Kiderlen A.F., Kayser O. Amphotericin B. Applied Microbiol Biotechnol 2005;68(2):151–62. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-005-1955-9.
8. Hamill R.J. Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity. Drugs 2013;73(9):919–34. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4.
9. Borba H.H.L., Steimbach L.M., Riveros B.S. et al. Cost-effectiveness of amphotericin B formulations in the treatment of systemic fungal infections. Mycoses 2018;61(10):754–63. DOI: 10.1111/mic.12801.
10. Kaur L., Abhijeet J.S.K. Safe and Effective Delivery of Amphotericin B: A Survey of Patents. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 2017;11(3):214–34. DOI: 10.2174/1872210511666170105130210.
11. Tevyashova A. N., Bychkova E.N., Solovieva S.E. et al. Discovery of Amphamide, a Drug Candidate for the Second Generation of Polyene Antibiotics. ACS Infect Dis 2020;6:2029–44. ttps://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00068
12. European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (Council of Europe), ETS No. 123, 1986.
13. Guskova T.A. Drug toxicology. Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.).
14. Fielding R.M., Singer A.W., Wang L.H. et al. Relationship of pharmacokinetics and drug distribution in tissue to increased safety of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion in dogs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992;36(2):299–307. DOI: 10.1128/aac.36.2.299.
15. Fanos V., Cataldi L. Amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity: A review. J Chemother 2000;12(6):463–70. DOI: 10.1179/joc.2000.12.6.463.
16. Sabra R., Takahashi K., Branch R.A., Badr K.F. Mechanisms of amphotericin B induced reduction of the glomerular filtration rate: a micropuncture study. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990;253:34–7. PMID: 2329517.
17. Danaher P.J., Cao M.K., Anstead G.M., Matthew J. et al. Reversible dilated cardiomyopathy related to amphotericin B therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;53:115–7. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg472.
Review
For citations:
Treschalin I.D., Golibrodo V.A., Treschalin M.I., Tevyashova A.N., Pereverzeva E.R. PRECLINICAL TOXICITY STUDY OF THE NEW ANTIFUNGAL DRUG AMPHAMID. Russian Journal of Biotherapy. 2020;19(3):57-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2020-19-3-57-64