Neutralizing ability of monoclonal antibodies directed to epitopes of functionally significant Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumolysin domain
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2025-24-3-19-28
Abstract
Background. Pneumolysin (Ply) – bacterial cholesterol-dependent cytolysin produced by almost all strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antibodies induced to pneumolysin for some extend are able to neutralize its pathogenic effect on cells.
Aim. Investigation of the effect of monoclonal antibodies obtained to native (nPly) and recombinant (rPly) forms of Ply on the neutralization of the cytolytic activity of bacterial Ply in vitro and their preventive properties on mice challenged with a virulent strain of S. pneumoniae.
Materials and methods. mAbs to the nPly and rPly forms of Ply was obtained from the ascitic fluid of mice. Polyclonal antibodies pAbs (rPly) were obtained from the serum of rabbits immunized with rPly. The inhibition of erythrocyte hemolysis was assessed by the minimum concentration of mAbs (nPly), pAbs (rPly) and pAbs (rPly), which prevents lysis of erythrocytes induced by nPly. The neutralizing ability of antibodies was evaluated on the ovarian cells of the Chinese hamster CHO-K1 by the minimum concentration of antibodies necessary to protect cells from 4 cytopathogenic doses of nPly. The protective properties of the antibodies were studied with a single intraperitoneal injection of 200 µg of antibodies to mice, followed by challenge with a lethal dose of S. pneumoniae.
Results. It was shown that 24 hours after intraperitoneal administration of nPly to mice, the body weight of the animals decreased and degenerative forms of red blood cells appeared in the blood. In in vitro experiments, nPly caused hemolysis of erythrocytes and destruction of CHO-K1 cells by the mechanism of apoptosis. mAbs (nPly), mAbs (rPly) and pAbs (rPly) inhibited erythrocyte hemolysis and neutralized the destruction of CHO-K1 cells. The highest neutralizing activity was shown by mAbs (rPly) and pAbs (rPly). A single injection of the studied antibodies to mice caused a decrease of their death when infected with the S. pneumoniae strain. There were no differences in the protective activity of antibodies.
Conclusion. Methods based on neutralizing the toxic effect of Ply S. pneumoniae with the help of antibodies can be considered as a tool to reduce the pathogenicity of pneumococci.
About the Authors
Ekaterina A. KurbatovaRussian Federation
Ekaterina Alexeevna Kurbatova
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Irina V. Yakovleva
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Natalya F. Gavrilova
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Denis S. Vorobyev
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Ekaterina E. Petukhova
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Irina B. Semenova
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Anton E. Zaitsev
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Yuri V. Volokh
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Nune O. Vartanova
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Alexander V. Poddubikov
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Olga M. Afanasyeva
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
Alexander A. Zubkov
Russian Federation
5A Maly Kazenny Lane, Moscow 105064
References
1. Marshall J.E., Faraj B.H.A., Gingras A.R. et al. The crystal structure of pneumolysin at 2.0Å resolution reveals the molecular packing of the pre-pore complex. Sci Rep 2015;5:13293. DOI: 10.1038/srep13293
2. Lawrence S.L., Feil S.C., Morton C.J. et al. Crystal structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumolysin provides key insights into early steps of pore formation. Sci Rep 2015;5:14352. DOI: 10.1038/srep14352
3. Vögele M., Bhaskara R.M., Mulvihill E. et al. Membrane perforation by the pore-forming toxin pneumolysin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019;116(27):13352–7. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904304116
4. Kurbatova E.A., Yakovleva I.V., Gavrilova N.F. et al. Cytopathogenic effect of Streptococcus pneumoniae native pneumolysin in CHO-K1 cells. Rossijskij bioterapevticeskij zurnal = Russian Journal of Biotherapy 2024;23(1):51–7. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1726-9784-2024-23-1-51-57
5. Ganpule S., Vijaya A.K., Sukova A., Preta G. Membrane cholesterol content and lipid organization influence melittin and pneumolysin pore-forming activity. Toxins (Basel) 2022;14(5):346. DOI: 10.3390/toxins14050346
6. Kucinskaite-Kodze I., Simanavicius M., Dapkunas J. et al. Mapping of recognition sites of monoclonal antibodies responsible for the inhibition of pneumolysin functional activity. Biomolecules 2020;10(7):1009. DOI: 10.3390/biom10071009
7. Del Mar García-Suárez M., Cima-Cabal M.D., Flórez N. et al. Protection against pneumococcal pneumonia in mice by monoclonal antibodies to pneumolysin. Infect Immun 2004;72(8):4534–40. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4534-4540.2004
8. De Los Toyos J.R., Méndez F.J., Aparicio J.F. et al. Functional analysis of pneumolysin by use of monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun 1996;64(2):480–4. DOI: 10.1128/iai.64.2.480-484.1996
9. Sephalika S., Mohakud N.K., Johargy A.K. et al. Development of an immunochromatographic test strip to detect pneumolysin by monoclonal antibody capture method. Journal of King Saud University – Science 2024;36(6):103213. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103213
10. Cima-Cabal M.D., Méndez F.J., Vázquez F. et al. A specific and ultrasensitive chemiluminescent sandwich ELISA test for the detection and quantitation of pneumolysin. J Immunoassay Immunochem 2001;22(2):99–112. DOI: 10.1081/IAS-100103223
11. Suárez-Álvarez B., García-Suárez Mdel M., Méndez F.J., de los Toyos J.R. Characterization of mouse monoclonal antibodies for pneumolysin: Fine epitope mapping and V gene usage. Immunol Lett 2003;88(3):227–39. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2478(03)00081-6
12. Jefferies J.M.C., Johnston C.H.G., Kirkham L.S. et al. Presence of nonhemolytic pneumolysin in serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae associated with disease outbreaks. J Infect Dis 2007;196(6):936–44. DOI: 10.1086/520091
13. Yakovleva I.V., Gavrilova N.F., Kurbatova E.A. et al. Immunochemical characteristics and functional activity of monoclonal antibodies obtained to the recombinant form of pneumolysin. Bull Exp Biol Med 2025;178(3):346–50. DOI: 10.1007/s10517-025-06334-w
14. Kurbatova E.A., Yakovleva I.V., Gavrilova N.F. et al. Development of the test system based on enzyme immunoassay for the detection of recombinant Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumolysin. Rossijskij bioterapevticeskij zurnal = Russian Journal of Biotherapy 2023;22(4):52–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1726-9784-2023-22-4-52-59
15. Vorobyev D.S., Sidorov A.V., Kaloshin A.A. et al. Preparation a recombinant form of pneumolysin protein from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Bull Exp Biol Med 2023;174(6):749–53. DOI: 10.1007/s10517-023-05785-3
16. Vorobyev D.S., Sidorov A.V., Ammour Y.I. et al. Analysis of toxicity of recombinant pneumolysin from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Bull Exp Biol Med 2024;177(1):137–9. DOI: 10.1007/s10517-024-06145-5
17. Broecker F., Anish C., Seeberger P.H. Generation of monoclonal antibodies against defined oligosaccharide antigens. Methods Mol Biol 2015;1331:57–80. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2874-3_5
18. Yu L., Zhu G., Zhang Z. et al. Apoptotic bodies: bioactive treasure left behind by the dying cells with robust diagnostic and therapeutic application potentials. J Nanobiotechnol 2023;21(1):218. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-023-01969-1
19. Petukhova E.S., Vorobyev D.S., Sidorov A.V. et al. Immunization with recombinant pneumolysin Induces the production of antibodies and protects mice in a model of systemic Infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Bull Exp Biol Med 2020;68(4):485–7. DOI: 10.1007/s10517-020-04736-6
Review
For citations:
Kurbatova E.A., Yakovleva I.V., Gavrilova N.F., Vorobyev D.S., Petukhova E.E., Semenova I.B., Zaitsev A.E., Volokh Yu.V., Vartanova N.O., Poddubikov A.V., Afanasyeva O.M., Zubkov A.A. Neutralizing ability of monoclonal antibodies directed to epitopes of functionally significant Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumolysin domain. Russian Journal of Biotherapy. 2025;24(3):19-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2025-24-3-19-28



































